Close the CIPA Claim Consent Gap

Start free trial
USA_Swimming_logo
Blockchain_logo
Nissan
Volvo_Car
Subaru
Kawasaki
Logitech
Lindt
Burger_King
UNICEF
Tonys_Chocolonely
Strava
Northwestern_University
Hershey_Entertainment__Resorts
Nobu black

Your CCPA setup won’t stop a CIPA claim

CCPA and CIPA address different legal issues. A functioning “Do Not Sell or Share” link does not address CIPA’s prior-consent requirement.

Most U.S. consent setups let trackers load before a visitor sees a banner. Under CIPA, that sequencing is the violation, not the tracker itself.

Session replay tools, chat widgets, and ad pixels drive a large share of CIPA demand letters. Standard setups often treat them as routine analytics, but they’re not.

Statutory damages under CIPA Section 638.51 run up to $5,000 per violation. Any website with meaningful California traffic is enough to create real exposure.

Online tracking lawsuits jumped nearly 1,900% from 2023 to 2024, filed across 315 courts in 45 states.

California visitors get an opt-in layer, not opt-out

Configure your Cookiebot CMP to apply a GDPR-style opt-in layer to California visitors, instead of the standard CCPA/CPRA "Do Not Sell or Share" opt-out setup. Trackers stay off until they give affirmative consent. Visitors outside California keep your standard U.S. opt-out experience.

Also supports Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA) configuration for applicable services.

High-risk trackers stay blocked until consent

Pre-categorize and block the technologies that are cited most often in CIPA recent CIPA lawsuits with the CIPA Consent Template. They stay blocked until California visitors actively give consent.

  • Session replay tools (including Hotjar and FullStory)
  • Third-party chatbots (including Drift and Intercom)
  • Advertising pixels (including Meta Pixel)

No scripts fire before consent

The CIPA Consent Template is designed to prevent any configured scripts from firing before a visitor interacts with the consent layer and gives consent. This includes transmitting routing, addressing, or signaling information. 

This is designed to address the "pen register" issue behind CIPA § 638.51 claims directly. Because no script has run before consent, no data is captured before consent.

Cookiebot bg shield

Ready to use in your Cookiebot Admin Interface

Works within your existing Cookiebot CMP setup, no custom development needed

Geotargeting live from day one

Every consent interaction logged, timestamped, and exportable

Global Privacy Control (GPC) signals detected and honored automatically

Compatible with Google Consent Mode, Microsoft UET and Clarity, and Amazon Consent Signal

Cookiebot bg shield

Frequently asked questions

No. No CMP configuration can provide a legal safe harbor, and Cookiebot™ does not make that claim. This page describes a consent infrastructure configuration that addresses the conditions behind most CIPA claims. If you’ve received a demand letter, engage legal counsel promptly.

Your Cookiebot CMP pre-categorizes and blocks the technologies most frequently named in recent CIPA litigation: session replay tools, third-party chatbots, and advertising pixels. You can review and adjust the categorization in your CMP configuration.

Your legal counsel should advise on which technologies require prior consent for your specific deployment.

Geotargeting means only visitors matching your configured location (with a California IP address) see the stricter opt-in banner. Everyone else keeps your standard consent experience. Regional settings and CMP display for visitors can be even further customized in the Admin Interface.

It supports both, to a point. Blocking video-adjacent tracking until consent addresses part of the VPPA overlap, and the same prior-consent configuration reduces exposure under the federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), CIPA's federal counterpart. Specifics for your video, streaming, or tracking stack should still be reviewed with your own legal counsel.

Setup just requires activating the CIPA Consent Template from inside your existing Cookiebot Admin Interface. It’s a pre-configured setup, so likely in minutes. No new script and no developer are required for existing customers, and for new customers, the template is available immediately upon account creation.

No, none of them address what CIPA actually regulates. CCPA/CPRA governs the sale and sharing of personal data and gives visitors an opt-out right. A functioning "Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information" link satisfies that opt-out obligation, and honoring Global Privacy Control signals is an active CCPA/CPRA enforcement priority.

But CIPA is a separate law that governs the interception of communications, and generally requires prior opt-in consent before tracking technologies fire at all. Neither the opt-out link nor GPC prevents scripts from loading before consent, which is the specific behavior CIPA claims target. CIPA also carries a private right of action, so individuals can sue directly rather than waiting for a regulator to enforce.

Yes. CIPA applies whenever a California resident's communications are intercepted, regardless of where the business is headquartered. Any website with meaningful California visitor traffic can be sued under CIPA, even if the company has no physical presence in the state.